Covid-19 testing uses the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique that was invented by Kary Mullis in 1985 and he won the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for this invention. Kary stated that PCR was to be used for research purposes only. Kary stated publically that the “it doesn’t tell you that you’re sick”. And he also stated “with PCR if you do it well you can find almost anything in anybody”.
This link provides a video where Kary Mullis made these statements:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/wOSeTz57xrCF/
On January 20, 2020, the first case of Covid-19 was reported in America and President Donald Trump declared the U.S. outbreak a public health emergency on January 31. In response on March 2020, Abbott Laboratories developed a new kit that uses Kary Mullis’ PCR technique to identify whether a person has Covid-19 or not even though Kary had stated it was not to be used for that purpose.
“In March 2020, Abbott received emergency use authorization (EUA) from the FDA for a Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 test to help mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic. Abbott's point-of-care test is regarded as a valuable development due to its small size, which is comparable to a small toaster, and rapid results – 5-minute positive, 13-minute negative. Detroit became the first city to receive these tests on April 1, 2020. Also in March, Abbott received EUA for a molecular COVID-19 test that runs on its m2000 RealTime lab-based platform.” Quoted from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbott_Laboratories
In March 2020, President Trump unveiled the new Abbott PCR test at the White House. The video of the unveiling ceremony is shown below where the new test is displayed. It is amazing that two months after the public health emergency was called Abbott Laboratories had a new test kit ready to mass produce and ship everywhere in the United States.
The PCR test only received FDA emergency use approval because Trump had declared a public health emergency. In other words, if Trump had not declared the emergency this test could not have received approval. As with all FDA emergency approvals, no long term studies were performed to identify the safety or accuracy of this test. The risks of taking this test are reported here and should be reviewed prior to taking this test.
This video below further explains the history and issues of using this test to determine if you have Covid. Cycle Threshold issues are explained in this video.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/xYtBf4QkXPpE/
Jun 2021 - Dr. Ron Paul on PCR Testing Issues
Dr. Ron Paul has talked of the PCR testing issues in many of his shows. In this show he talks about how the PCR cycle thresholds were changed to have more or less cases of Covid-19. Early on in the pandemic the cycle thresholds were set high so that more cases of Covid would be found. Then after the vaccine was introduced they set the cycle thresholds lower so that it would appear that the vaccine is working.
Jan 2021 - Why PCR Cycle Threshold Is Useful in Coronavirus Testing
“With these type of tests, it's critical to use an agreed-upon cycle threshold value such as 33 (CDC) or 35 (Dr. Fauci) rather than setting it at a potentially misleading 40 or 45. Many of the current tests in use are preset by the manufacturer to these higher numbers.
The World Health Organization issued a notice last week telling the labs "the cut-off should be manually adjusted to ensure that specimens with high Ct values are not incorrectly assigned SARS-CoV-2 detected due to background noise." Could this be a reason why many people test positive but remain asymptomatic? In that same memo, WHO said all labs should report the cycle threshold value to treating physicians.”
Quoted from MedPageToday, January 4, 2021, https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/90508
Feb 2021 - The Problems with the COVID-19 Test: A Necessary Understanding; Cycle Threshold
“Cycle Threshold [Ct] values are set by test kit manufacturers and by testing laboratories.14 They are not standardized within provinces or countries which adds to the unreliability of the COVID-19 test.12 Recent papers have suggested that a Ct greater than 24 should not be used to infer the presence of a “live or infectious” virus since above that level the exquisite sensitivity of the test will amplify sequences of viruses from other sources.8,15 The sources could be; “dead or non-infectious” SARS-CoV-2, general cell debris, endemic coronaviruses, other pathogens, and from contamination during collection, transportation and preparation of samples.12
The CDC accepts a Ct of around 40.10 In Canada the Ct levels range from a low of 33 in Newfoundland to a high of 45 in Quebec.16 In Ontario the Ct ranges from 38-45.16 The Canadian levels appear to be high since the increase in cycles between 24 and 45 would increase by billions the amount of RNA which might include not only the unique gene sequence purported to represent SARS-CoV-2 but “foreign RNA” from the sources previously noted. According to a recent Canadian investigation, “an individual who tests positive with cycle count of 35-40 is very likely not contagious and would not require self-isolation, because their viral load would be extremely low.”16 This concurs with a statement by Dr. A. Fauci of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. In a July 16th 2020 podcast for “This Week in Virology” he clearly implied that tests performed at Ct levels of 35 or above do not reliably indicate the presence of live infectious viruses. On July 30th, 2020, Dr. Barbara Yaffe (Director of Communicable Disease Control, Toronto Public Health) told the media that, “In fact, if you are testing in a population that doesn’t have very much COVID, you’ll get false positives almost half the time. That is, the person actually doesn’t have COVID, they have something else. They may have nothing.”16 In theory a negative COVID-19 test could be converted from negative to positive simply by raising the Ct value. The opposite is also true. For example, a person testing positive after 38 cycles in Ontario would test negative following 33 cycles in Newfoundland.
With Ct levels in Canada varying from 33 to 45, it is not surprising that, “up to 90% of the Canadian COVID cases could be false positives…”16 Since Canadian test results are recorded simply as RT-PCR positive or negative (yes or no) without indicating the Ct level, the interpretation of a result is fraught with ambiguity. An article in the July 2020 edition of the Journal of Medical Virology expressed caution about using the RT-qPCR test as the sole means of diagnosing COVID-19 without evidence of confirmatory clinical signs and symptoms.17
For all of the above reasons, a healthy dose of scepticism should be applied to all cases labelled as COVID-19 solely on the basis of a positive test result.”
Quoted from ‘OralHealth’, February 8, 2021, https://www.oralhealthgroup.com/features/the-problems-with-the-covid-19-test-a-necessary-understanding/
Feb 2021 - The Problems with the COVID-19 Test: A Necessary Understanding; Clinical Implications
“The RT-qPCR test amplifies converted RNA enough times allowing it to be detected. Mullis was quite adamant that PCR-viral load tests do not detect free infectious viruses, but rather identify genetic sequences of viruses.18 Recently Bullard emphasized that conclusion by stating, “RT-PCR detects RNA, not infectious virus…”15 It is not the whole virus that is being amplified but bits of its genetic sequence which, without the protein coat, are not infectious. Therefore, it is a mistake to infer that the test identifies whole infectious virus.”
Quoted from ‘OralHealth’, February 8, 2021, https://www.oralhealthgroup.com/features/the-problems-with-the-covid-19-test-a-necessary-understanding/
Jul 2021 - The test that caused a pandemic?
“Twenty two independent researchers and scientists have subsequently come together to peer-review this paper (not previously peer-reviewed), and have published the following review (which is peer-reviewed);
The review states: "The paper itself already signifies that a large number of false positive results are generated by this test, even under controlled laboratory conditions, making it completely unsuitable as a reliable virus screening method"”.
“Many scientists have been reporting for some time the problems associated with this PCR test. PCR stands for polymerase chain reaction which describes how just one molecule can be replicated in order to produce enough of it to detect. The Berkely scientist himself who invented the PCR method back in 1985, Kary Mullis, was concerned how this type of test can be abused and the results misinterpreted (deliberately or otherwise).”
Quoted from ’Total Health’ written by Leading Doctors, July 26, 2021 https://www.totalhealth.co.uk/blog/test-caused-pandemic
Dec 2021 - Sheriff Reveals Why People Shouldn’t Trust Covid-19 Testing Kits
“LA County Sheriff Alex Villanueva this week informed the Board of Supervisors in his country that his office would no longer use their coronavirus test kit provider, alleging that the company could share data from COVID-19 patients with the CCP government.
In a message reported by Fox News reporter Bill Melugin, Villanueva says he was told by the FBI’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Coordinator, who revealed “very concerning details” about Fulgent Genetics Corporation, the Temple City-founded company contracted by the county to give covid-19 tests.”
“The sheriff revealed he was “shocked to discover” that Fulgent has connections to numerous Chinese tech and genomics companies that are “related to China’s Academy of Medical Sciences, the State Council in China and are now under the control of the Chinese authorities.”
“He further said that Fulgent uses genetic information gotten from COVID-19 testing patients in studies, and caused concerns that data possibly stored by Fulgent outside the United States could be used by the Chinese government.”
Quoted from the Patriot Edition, December 1, 2021, https://patriotedition.com/sheriff-reveals-why-people-shouldnt-trust-covid-19-testing-kits/
Abbott Lab Lobbying
After the PCR machine was implemented in our hospitals across the nation, US congress and news agencies recommended testing for Covid whether you were sick or not. Congress was paid $4,060,000 to support and recommend testing for all people. The news agencies were paid advertising money so that they would recommend testing also. It is not surprising that our government is recommending Big Pharma solutions for Covid from the top health care lobbyist since this is how business is conducted at our capital – all votes and opinions are paid for by lobbyist.
Top Twenty Pharmaceuticals/Health Products, 2020
|
Client/Parent – Group/Company that paid Congress |
Total Paid |
|
Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America |
$25,946,000 |
|
Biotechnology Innovation Organization |
$12,560,000 |
|
Amgen Inc |
$11,150,000 |
|
Roche Holdings |
$11,020,000 |
|
Pfizer Inc (Vaccine) |
$10,870,000 |
|
AbbVie Inc |
$7,070,000 |
|
Gilead Sciences |
$7,030,000 |
|
Merck & Co (maker of Ivermectin & coming out with
new pill that will cost $700 each; this is why Ivermectin cannot be used for Covid. If they have a solution, they cannot get emergency approval for their new $700 pill.) |
$6,980,000 |
|
Pharmaceutical Care Management Assn |
$6,920,399 |
|
Bayer AG |
$6,510,000 |
|
Novartis AG |
$6,150,000 |
|
Eli Lilly & Co |
$5,830,000 |
|
Horizon Therapeutics |
$5,760,000 |
|
Johnson & Johnson (Vaccine) |
$5,570,000 |
|
Bristol-Myers Squibb |
$5,390,000 |
|
Medtronic Inc |
$5,003,000 |
|
Sanofi |
$4,610,000 |
|
Abbott Laboratories (Covid-19 Testing Kits) |
$4,060,000 |
|
Association for Accessible Medicines |
$3,990,000 |
|
Biogen |
$3,890,000 |
Source: https://www.opensecrets.org/
This is why our country must return to biblical law as shown in this verse:
“Judges and officers shalt thou make thee in all thy gates, which the LORD thy God giveth thee, throughout thy tribes: and they shall judge the people with just judgment. Thou shalt not wrest judgment; thou shalt not respect persons, neither take a gift: for a gift doth blind the eyes of the wise, and pervert the words of the righteous. That which is altogether just shalt thou follow, that thou mayest live, and inherit the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.” Deu 16:18-20
Corporate lobbying and advertising insures only the people with big money get their products promoted. Promoting natural immunity and herbs will not make anyone rich or lots of money. Natural immunity is free and anyone can grow their own herbs.
Conclusion
This PCR test was used to ensure that the number of cases of Covid-19 would be high and therefore produce panic throughout the world. These high numbers were used to justify quarantines, lock downs and vaccines. Panic causes fear and people do things that they would not normally do when they are scared like take this test or get a vaccine. Please say no to this test to avoid being part of their statistics and to avoid health issues this test might cause.
See these pages for more information:
Testing Injuries https://litigantlawrence.blogspot.com/p/pcr-testing-injuries.html
Test Kit Recalls https://litigantlawrence.blogspot.com/p/test-kit-recalled.html
Contaminated Tests https://litigantlawrence.blogspot.com/p/contaminated-test-kits.html
Religious Exemptions & Reasonable Accommodations https://litigantlawrence.blogspot.com/2021/11/eeoc-reasonable-accommodation-for.html
No comments:
Post a Comment